Shocking Facts About My Wrongful Conviction
Joey Moncarz
|
I was wrongfully convicted. I never hurt anyone in my life. There was only one abuser in that house, and it was not me. It was my very abusive ex-partner/business partner, who terrorized all of us at home, and who was absolutely determined to "remove" me. And the fraudulent New Zealand legal system complied willingly. In the absence of a case, the prosecutor relied on collusion with my lawyer, as well as coached witnesses and perjured testimony.
|
|
“Right, you should not have been convicted. There's a lot questionable here...
the totality [of the evidence] points to a different narrative."
- King's Counsel (KC) barrister in Wellington, after the trial
the totality [of the evidence] points to a different narrative."
- King's Counsel (KC) barrister in Wellington, after the trial
All this can be proven: (For a sampling of the proof, read HERE)
On top of that:
Yes, the New Zealand legal system is a fraud.
- FACT: For four years my ex partner was terrorizing me and her kids at home with all kinds of daily abuse.
- FACT: She was afraid that she would go to jail because of her abuse.
- FACT: She was very afraid that she would lose custody of her kids to me. (Even though it wasn't even a possibility.)
- FACT: Her kids preferred me over both their biological parents and used to tell everyone this.
- FACT: She had long been threatening to use the police to get rid of me and shut down the school
- FACT: She had long been threatening to lie to various authorities (such as the Ministry of Education) in order to get rid of me
- FACT: She had long been using false sexual accusations to bully me
- FACT: She had long been using the idea of child molestation (accusing other people and me) in order to bully me
- FACT: Every time I planned to move away, she demanded that I stay and continue to look after her kids. Then she would continue with her accusations, threats, bullying, lies, etc.
- FACT: She had long been trying to force her children to reject me and to repeat the lies she told about me
- FACT: She hired a private investigator to watch me in order to find "dirt" so that she could kick me out of the school - but found nothing. I was "too fucking moral" (her words).
- FACT: She threatened to kill me and shoot me with my own hunting rifles
- FACT: She was afraid because I had proof of her abuses
- FACT: She forced her daughter to give a police statement against her daughter's wishes and she forced her daughter to lie on the stand
- FACT: She had long been trying to “turn” school parents against me with lies and defamation
- FACT: She absolutely hated the school mothers, was insanely jealous, couldn't stand my friendship with some of them, and was desperate to end all my friendships
- FACT: She had long been saying anything she could to make people think the worst about me, and freely admitted it
- FACT: She couldn't stand the fact that neither the school parents nor I wanted to work with her, and that we would soon be moving the school to get away from her - and the allegations came 5 days after I informed her of this.
- FACT: She used blackmail to force me to resign from the Deep Green Bush-School. And to give you an idea of how she views the law, she emailed her blackmail letter to my hack of a lawyer (who just shrugged.)
On top of that:
- FACT: My own lawyer left out much of the above evidence, “forgot” evidence, did not follow my instructions, introduced ideas I had never spoken of before, cut me off while I was on the stand, would not let me cover all the previously-agreed-to information, did not cross-examine properly (such as failing to explore suspicious behavior by a Crown witness), did not explore possible coaching of a witness by the police, did not explore obvious coaching of one witness to another to lie on the stand, my lawyer secretly agreed with the prosecutor beforehand to not look into my ex's motivation (ignoring two previous judges' rulings), and then he forced me to lie on the stand and take the blame for his failure to provide the prosecutor with certain evidence. (This is the short list.)
- FACT: The Crown Prosecutor lied directly to the judge and to the jury and focused on issues (such as my educational philosophy) which had no relevance.
- FACT: The judge violated his own advice to the jury, and showed clear bias in completely dismissing a psychological report (see below), purposely ignored inconvenient facts and contradictory witness statements, and twisted evidence (such as my ex's frequent threats to use the police against me for exactly these kinds of charges) to portray me as guilty. Talk about confirmation bias.
- FACT: The Crown relied heavily on the testimony of one woman, a married staff member who was angry at me for not reciprocating her romantic feelings, who told me of the charges: "these things happen all the time, it's no big deal," AND who had been previously wanting to break the law and I was the one to keep telling her NO. She was either delusional or actively trying to entrap me. My lawyer knew all this but completely failed to raise it or cross examine her about it. Then she made outrageous statements in the courtroom that two psychologists found "ridiculous."
- FACT: Four independent psychologists assessed me and concluded that I demonstrated “no psychopathology,” “no deviant sexual interest,” and that I posed no danger to anyone, that I was “honorable,” and that I would make an excellent father.
Yes, the New Zealand legal system is a fraud.
“It is only now...that I am truly able to appreciate the New Zealand legal system for the fraud that it is...”
- Ani Mikaere, barrister, Colonising Myths, Maori Realities (2011)
- Ani Mikaere, barrister, Colonising Myths, Maori Realities (2011)
It was not actual facts, but me saying things like this that made me "guilty":
“[T]here is an unjustified faith in the [legal] system.”
- Professor Daniel Medwed, Distinguished Professor of Law and Criminal Justice at Northeastern University